In recent weeks, the dispute in Windstream’s bankruptcy between Windstream and its REIT spinoff Uniti Group over the lease transaction that ultimately led to Windstream’s chapter 11 bankruptcy has continued to escalate with Windstream filing an adversary complaint against Uniti.  In its complaint, Windstream seeks to recharacterize the lease as a disguised financing alleging that the lease resulted in a long-term transfer of billions of dollars to Uniti to the detriment of Windstream’s creditors. The debtors’ complaint also alleges that they were insolvent no later than the third quarter of 2017, and argues that the above-market rent payments and tenant capital improvements they were required to make under the lease constitute constructively fraudulent transfers, as the debtors have not received reasonably equivalent value under the lease.

Continue Reading

The Momentive Performance Materials bankruptcy resulted in a number of disputes on issues germane to bankruptcy practitioners, including on intercreditor agreements (as we wrote about here), the enforceability of makewhole premiums and the proper interest rate in the context of a Chapter 11 cramdown plan.  On that third issue, Judge Drain entered an order on remand in April addressing the proper cram-down rate for two classes of senior noteholders that had been issued replacement notes under Momentive’s Chapter 11 plan. Given the notices of appeal filed just days later, it looked like another round of appellate review might occur.  But on May 15, Momentive announced that it had elected to refinance those notes, resulting in a voluntary dismissal of the appeals.

Continue Reading